How do we get there?

Screen shot 2013-05-13 at 6.18.45 PM

Tackling Transportation and Growth in Jefferson County, Wednesday, June 12th at the Byrd Center, Shepherd University

With new citizens moving to Jefferson County daily, the county and the region must continue to explore opportunities that will help keep pace with an ever-growing demand on our roadway system.  On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 from 7-9 pm, transportation experts and stakeholders will gather at the Robert C. Byrd Legislative Studies Auditorium at Shepherd University to discuss innovative ways to approach future challenges.

 

The panel will include Senator Herb Snyder, who sponsored and helped enact legislation in support of the MARC commuter train to DC and commuter rail expansion in WV; Cheryl Keyrouze, Executive Director of the Eastern Panhandle Transit Authority which runs the PanTran busses; Jennifer Brockman, Director of Jefferson County Planning and Zoning which sponsored the recent Route 340 Corridor study; and J. Lee Thorne, District Engineer/Manager, Region 5, WV Department of Highways.

Like all League events, this forum is free and open to the public.

The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages the informed and active participation of citizens in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and advocacy

For more information about this event, contact Mary Sell at mbrosnansell@mwmlaw.com

Tell Senators it is time to stop violence

League of Women Voters  Take Action
Betsy –

For months, our nation has debated the laws governing the use of guns and ammunition in our country.  It’s clear that the majority of Americans want Congress to take new, strong steps to relieve the epidemic of gun violence across our nation.

Next week the Senate will vote on S. 649.  Tell your Senators it’s time to stop the violence. The League has been lobbying for common sense solutions to gun violence that will protect our children and our families and help restore public confidence.

S. 649 will require background checks on all gun purchases and impose stricter penalties for “straw purchases,” where one individual buys for another.  There will also be amendments from the floor of the Senate that the League strongly supports.  These amendments include Senator Feinstein’s Assault Weapons Ban and an amendment to limit the size of high capacity ammunition magazines.

Millions of Americans are at risk every day from senseless violence.  Responsible gun legislation is a critical matter of public safety and public health.  Tell your Senators this issue is too important to ignore any longer and that common sense solutions to gun violence will save lives.

 

 

 

Elisabeth MacNamara Sincerely,

Elisabeth MacNamara
President, League of Women Voters

Information about the CWVV Convention on May 4, 2013

Dear LWVJC Members:

The invitation to the LWVWV Convention from Pres. Susan Watkins is below.  We hope that you will make plans to attend!  Our chapter is hosting the event!  If you do plan to attend, please follow the registration process outlined by Susan, and also let me know: anncoulter@comcast.net.  As you will see in Susan’s invitation, our chapter will have 4 delegates (voting) and as many “visitors” as we want.  Once we know who is planning to attend, we will determine who will be our delegates at this convention. We expect our own VP, Carolyn Watson, to be elected to the Board of LWVWV!!! I look forward to hearing from you and seeing you at the convention!  Ann Coulter, Membership Chair, LWVJC

 

Dear LWVWV Members:

This is the official call to the State League Convention to be held in Charles Town on Saturday, May 4, 2013. The Jefferson Co. League has graciously agreed to host the meeting.

The meeting will be held at the Hampton Inn and Suites, 157 Pimlico Dr., Charles Town. Registration will begin at 9:00 a.m. with the call to order at 10:00 a.m. Business should be completed by 3:00 p.m. Business to be conducted includes the election of officers and directors and approval of the budget, bylaws changes and program. Sean O’Leary, a journalist with the Martinsburg Journal, is the guest speaker. Attached is an abstract of our consensus positions, proposed budget, proposed bylaws change and nominating committee report.

Who is eligible to attend convention? Each local League is entitled to one delegate in addition to its president, or an alternate should the president be unable to attend. Leagues having more than 15 voting members are entitled to one additional delegate for each additional 10 voting members or major fraction thereof as of January 31, 2013. Other League members attending are designated as “visitors.” The registration fee for delegates and visitors is $25.00, which includes lunch, and may be paid on the day of the convention. Please pre-register by April 25 by contacting Susan Watkins at 304-343-8574 or susanwatkins@suddenlink.net. (Please let Ann Coulter know that you are registered: anncoulter@comcast.net) .

Based on the membership numbers reported in January 2013, each League may send the following number of delegates:

Huntington (59): president + 5 delegates

Jefferson Co. (35): president + 3 delegates

Morgantown/Monongalia Co. (56): president + 5 delegates

Wood Co. (37): president + 3 delegates

We hope to have a good turnout and look forward to seeing you on May 4. If you have any questions, please contact susanwatkins@suddenlink.net.

Susan K. Watkins, President,

League of Women Voters of West Virginia

The League is where hands-on work to safeguard democracy leads to civic improvement. Join us!

Jefferson County was chosen for the site of the West Virginia LWV State Convention.

The state Convention will convene at the Charles Town Hampton Inn during the weekend of May 3rd and 4th.

Local chapters from all over the state will arrive to discuss issues of particular importance to all West Virginia League members.

The Board of Directors of the League of Women Voters of West Virginia has selected the following issues as its advocacy priorities for the 2013 legislative session:

1. The LWVWV supports the expansion of Medi- caid under the Affordable Care Act.

2. The LWVWV supports regulation of all extrac- tive industries to protect West Virginia’s people and environment, including land, water, and air, and supports adequate funding for enforcement.

3. The LWVWV supports measures that will en- courage energy efficiency, such as energy efficiency resource standards and least cost planning.

4. The LWVWV supports extension of the Supreme Court of Appeals Public Financing Pilot Project through the 2016 General Election.

5. The LWVWV opposes the adoption of Voter ID laws in West Virginia.

In addition the LWVUS supports gun control.

In-depth article on Impact Fees in Jefferson County

Screen shot 2013-02-24 at 6.02.18 PM

What are Impact fees?

Impact fees are money paid by builders to Jefferson County for the purpose of providing public services that will be provided to the new home.  In Jefferson the fees must be paid to the county before a building permit will be issued.  The fees are rigorously calculated using the actual county expenditures for services that the county currently provides its citizens.  Those fees are then extended incrementally for one more new house or one more business to all development in the county.  The impact fee is a one time payment and not a tax.

The impact fee charges for Jefferson County are for schools to educate new students, emergency services for police, fire and medical protection and parks.  No impact fees are charged in Jefferson for environmental impacts, libraries, sewer, water, run off drainage or public facilities like public meeting places.  Fees are charged to developments only to the degree that the development will use the fee.  For example, houses need schools for children raised in the houses, but business do not need schools, so, new business development is not charged school impact fees. The fees are calculated for each type of housing or business based on the existing level of service for the new development.

Without Impact Fees – An Example of No Impact Fees

Below is a theoretical situation for demonstration of impact fee purpose. – Today the Jefferson County Planning Commission approved a special new housing subdivision in Jefferson County.  The new subdivision will have houses with no kitchens in their floor plans.  Our neighbor citizens will provide their kitchens.  One neighbor will provide the refrigerator for the new homeowners. One will provide his stove whenever needed.  Another neighbor will provide her sink and trash compactor while another will provide his dishwasher for the new home owners.  One final neighbor will provide her table and chairs.  This novel arrangement allows the houses to be sold cheaper although it is admitted that sacrifices must be made by current residents for the new home owners to enjoy Jefferson County.  The same principle holds for impacts fees.  Impact fees ask new residents to pay for their appropriate portion of public services that they will use at exactly the same rate as county residents who have already purchased and built.  Those public services are schools for their children, fire, police and EMS protection, and parks.

How the Impact Fees are determined in Jefferson County

Consider the Impact fee for schools:  The impact fee for schools is calculated by a detailed and involved process.  Each student in Jefferson County Public Schools is identified as an elementary school, middle school or high school student and his or her home address is mapped to a house type in the county such as a single family home, a town home, mobile home or rental apartment.  A pupil generation factor is calculated for each home type which results in the numbers of students in each type of home in the county. Mathematically this number can be expressed as the average number of students per a single family house in the county.  For example the data shows:

On average the Students per Single Family Housing unit in the county are:

0.18 elementary student + 0.08 middle school student + 0.11 high school student

Similar calculations are made for all types of housing in the county.

The Jefferson County Schools incur costs for land purchase, building construction, bus purchases, maintenance buildings, administration offices and school equipment such as desks and computers.  These expenditures are called capital costs.  Using these costs and known student populations of the buildings, a capital cost per student is calculated.  Those tabulations show the total capital cost per student in Jefferson County:

Elementary         Middle          High school

Capital costs per student:       $30,232.15      $39,274.48      $46,477.41

The numbers shown are actual capital costs for a student in the Jefferson County Schools.  These costs are capital only and do not include operating costs such as teacher salaries.  Operating costs for the schools are paid for by property taxes in WV.

Therefore, the school capital costs for a home in Jefferson County can be found by using the capital costs calculations plus the students per household numbers. It can be thought of as the school capital cost of one more house built.  It totals $11,358.00 for a single family unit.  Similar calculations of school impacts are made for the other types of housing in the county.

Development in our county also has impacts for fire protection and emergency services, police and law enforcement and for parks and recreation facilities.  Detailed calculations are made of public capital funds in these individual areas using actual Jefferson County capital expenditure dollars and are then allocated to development in the county.

The results of these calculations are an impact fee of $13,070.00 per single family house built in Jefferson County.  The fee is comprised of 87% a school impact, 2% police and law enforcement impact, 5.7% for Parks and 5.3% for fire protection.  It is charged for every new single family house built in the county.  It is also derived for other types of housing in the county and for businesses started in the county according to their need for public services and the cost of an extra unit of those services.

The impact is spoken of as the incremental cost of new single family housing in the county to maintain the level of service (better read as quality of living) for the education of our children, protecting our homes, and providing parks for our relaxation equal to what we have now.

The fees in the County today are:

The impact fees imposed on development in 2012 are below.

Screen shot 2013-02-27 at 4.11.24 PM

The impacts must be used with the comprehensive plan of the County but not with the zoning of the county.  The fees may not be used as a “No Growth” policy or to dictate patterns of growth.  The fees are intended as growth facilitators within the county.  This claim is heavily debated.  The fees must be implemented in a manner of assessment, collection, and expenditure to clearly qualify the payment as a fee and not a tax.  This legal responsibility has been fairly implemented in Jefferson County.

What the fees have done

The impact fees collected in the last five years (2006 through 2012) total $25,173,678.  This includes $23,999,328 for new school construction in Jefferson County.  If these funds were not collected from the new development in the county, there would have been an additional tax obligation to the 2011 estimated population of Jefferson County of $144.15 for each person to retain our current quality of county services or additional tax charges of $432.01 per the 18,093 single family homes in Jefferson County in 2011.

Benefits Claims of Impact Fees

Benefits of Impact fees are:

1. New development pays for additional services needed by new development rather than charging existing residents.

2. Real estate taxes of existing local residents are protected from costs of new development.

3. The fees act as a growth facilitator as they ensure that needed public services are financially feasible for development and are equal to the services currently available in the county.

Frequent criticisms of impact fees with answers to each Criticism:

1.

Criticism

The fees are heavily criticized by the Jefferson development community as inequitable demands upon development to fund public facilities for the county population.

Response to Criticism

The fees ask new residents to pay their appropriate part of public capital investment associated with their development.  Other communities have commercial industry and require their industry to fund public capital needs for services.  Jefferson has limited industry, and does not ask its residents to pay more property taxes than other communities who have industries.  Therefore, each development must pay its share of impact on community services.

2.

Criticism

The fees hurt development and business growth.

Response to Criticism

The fees ensure complete development of both public and private expenditures for new development in the county.  New residents to the community expect public facilities to be at the current level of service.  Without impact fees in Jefferson and with large development rates there is no way that public services can maintain their current level of service to the county without raising taxes on existing residents.

3.

Criticism

Fees are charged for development such as schools, public protections and parks without regard for possible operational capacity that may already exist.

Response to Criticism

There is no buffer capacity in Jefferson County for public services.  It does not exist.  This is especially true in our schools.  Overall, West Virginia is a state with a declining population.  With this fact, it is not possible to get any state funding that can be used for future needs of schools.  Any state funding done in the state is calculated for an existing or smaller population than a growing population’s need.  Further, public expenditure comparisons show the county is far underserviced in public parks compared to neighboring metropolitan area expectations.  There are no buffer capacities in Jefferson public facilities.

4.

Criticism

Fees are extended to all development without breaks for the local long time resident to build homes for their children on their property.

Response to Criticism

Impact fees must be implemented equally to all development.  No breaks in impact fee implementation are allowed by law.  This rule is needed to prevent favoritism and to maintain the integrity and fairness of the system.  Impact fees are not taxes that are subject to political manipulation of emphasis by loopholes.  Fees are one time payments of appropriate public capital required for the development to maintain current levels of service in the community without political breaks.

5.

Criticism

School Impact Fee needs have been largely supplemented by revenues from Hollywood Casino table games.  The impact fees started before the table games revenue stream and their needs have been diminished by the extra gambling revenues.

Response to Criticism

The revenue stream from the race track that is allocated for schools in Jefferson County is intended for all of its citizens and not to deal with impacts from the new citizens of Jefferson County.  Enormous needs for county schools should be addressed by these funds for all of our population and not just for newcomers.  In addition, the table games revenue is subject to competition from surrounding states and is not stable.

6.

Criticism

Impact Fees unfairly charge a flat fee for residential houses.  Small houses are charged the same fee as larger houses, which usually provide a larger school impact than a very small house.

Response to Criticism

Separate studies have been done to address this criticism.  The results of the studies show inconclusive data for the appropriate fee modification.  Some studies show a higher student population in smaller homes.  Most studies show that using square footage of housing to determine impact fees becomes more complex and that the system becomes subject to “gaming” of the definition of square feet for houses.  The proposed changes have not been implemented for this reason.

Court reviews of Impact Fees

Court reviews of impact fees across the country have supported public governing entities collecting fees for development to the maximum degree of development’s need for additional public facilities. Possibly because of this fact, no local court reviews of county impacts fees have occurred.

The courts have reviewed impact fees upon development by local governments along the legal idea of a “rational nexus” between the developer and the government.  The nexus test refers to a joint activity between the developer and the government for furtherance of the needs of the development.  This partnership idea of government and development demands that the impact fee be based upon below guidelines:

  • All fees must be attributable to a development impact on services.
  • Fees must show a reasonable connection of the fee charged and the public needs of the development
  • Fees must be proportional to the amount charged to developers and the public facilities needed by the development
  • Fees must be applied to all development on the same basis.  All new development that creates an impact on the community must be assessed the same kind of fees; however, those fees may vary by the magnitude of the impacts and related to the public purpose. (Interpretation here not simply understood.)
  • The methodology and derivation of the fees must clearly define the impact fee as a fee to pay for public facilities and not as a tax upon the development.

Jefferson County compliance within these guidelines defines a safe harbor for the collection of impact fees from development in the county without challenge in the courts.

APA Impact Fee Standards

The American Planning Association, APA, has adopted Impact Fee standards which are presented below:

• The imposition of a fee must be rationally linked (the “rational nexus”) to an impact

created by a particular development and the demonstrated need for related capital

improvements pursuant to a capital improvement plan and program.

• Some benefit must accrue to the development as a result of the payment of a fee.

• The amount of the fee must be a proportionate fair share of the costs of the improvements

made necessary by the development and must not exceed the cost of the improvements.• A fee cannot be imposed to address existing deficiencies except where they are

exacerbated by new development.

• Funds received under such a program must be segregated from the general fund and used

solely for the purposes for which the fee is established.

• The fees collected must be encumbered or expended within a reasonable timeframe to

ensure that needed improvements are implemented.

• The fee assessed cannot exceed the cost of the improvements, and credits must be given

for outside funding sources (such as federal and state grants, developer initiated

improvements for impacts related to new development, etc.) and local tax payments which

fund capital improvements, for example.

• The fee cannot be used to cover normal operation and maintenance or personnel costs, but

must be used for capital improvements, or under some linkage programs, affordable

housing, job training, child care, etc.

• The fee established for specific capital improvements should be reviewed at least every two

years to determine whether an adjustment is required, and similarly the capital

improvement plan and budget should be reviewed at least every 5 to 8 years.

• Provisions must be included in the ordinance to permit refunds for projects that are not

constructed, since no impact will have manifested.

• Impact fee payments are typically required to be made as a condition of approval of the

development, either at the time the building or occupancy permit is issued.

Take action. Contact your Commissioner Information: 304-728-3284 or email Dale Manuel, President:

dmanuel@frontiernet.net.

Suffrage Centennial Celebration March 1-3 2013 in DC

unitewomenorg

Click here to go to Suffrage Centennial Celebration website.

Their history is our history–and the Suffrage Centennial Celebration will celebrate us all.

Come learn from the bold, brave band of suffragists who marched down Pennsylvania Avenue on March 3, 1913, proudly demanding their right to vote.

Unstoppable from 1013 until women got the vote in 1920, they changed our history and our lives.

Spend an amazing weekend soaking up our past and present, surrounded by history and history-i-the-making.Plan to be changed (stunned, angered, inspired) at special exhibits at museums and beyond, terrific panels and lectures, movies and special events–even a multimedia staged reading of a critically acclaimed off-Broadway play about Alice Paul.

Highly historic, perfectly timely.

Wherever ou are, get here..

Screen shot 2013-02-14 at 3.43.12 PM

Pre-session Q & A with State Representatives

 

PRE-SESSION Q & A WITH

STATE REPRESENTATIVES

SNYDER, UNGER,

SKINNER, ESPINOSA and LAWRENCE

 

Get insight into 2013 legislative session in Charleston. 

Raise your concerns and issues.

 

Saturday, February 2, 2013

11:30 am

DISH restaurant, 213 W. Washington Street, Charles Town

 

Optional Luncheon: $13. 

RSVP by January 31st

to rennyts@aol.com or 304 876 2583

or through the website http://civicwomen.wordpress.com/

— or Facebook

 

 

This event is open to the public. 

Bring your friends & neighbors.

 

The League of Women Voters does not support any political party or candidate.  But it is a political organization which encourages the informed and active participation of citizens in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and advocacy.